Two new reports say urgent action needed to build on new momentum
Two new reports point to India’s improved performance in reducing its high burden of malnutrition. But both reports point out that this improvement could—and should–be much more rapid.
The first report, the 2015 India Health Report (IHR), offers a critical analysis of the current situation with nutrition at the national and state levels. It provides state-wise data dashboards for 28 states and Delhi that give a comprehensive view of nutrition and its determinants. It looks at disparities in these outcomes and their multiple determinants across geographical regions, socio-economic classes, and demographic groups and helps identify strategic choices for policy-making at the state level.
Professor Ramanan Laxminarayan, Distinguished Professor, PHFI, Co-author, India Health Report said, “In this inaugural India Health Report, we focused on the topic of child stunting and malnutrition, given its magnitude and persistence in our country.”
Highlighting the findings from the report he notes, “Even with recent impressive improvements, India’s stunting problem represents the largest loss of human potential in any country in human history. If the population of stunted children in India were a single country, it would be the ninth largest country in the world. Even more worrisome, the problem of undernutrition in India now coexists with the problem of over nutrition and associated non-communicable diseases for a different segment of the population.”
A central message of the IHR is that the performance at the all-India level masks significant differences in state level performance and it is at level of the states that the battle against malnutrition must now be fought.
Purnima Menon, Senior Research Fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute, and Co-author, India Health Report, noted, “The scope of action needs to be broad, but given the tremendous variability in implementation across states on delivery of indicators of nutrition and health programmes, water and sanitation coverage, food security and anti-poverty programmes, there is a clear need to invest in closing delivery gaps. Our report also highlights the critical relationships between indicators of women’s status and nutrition, and this is an absolutely urgent area for action.”
The second report, the 2015 Global Nutrition Report (GNR), assesses progress in reducing malnutrition for all 193 countries. It concludes that India is on track to meet two of eight global targets on nutrition and has significantly improved its nutrition performance in the past 10 years. The GNR notes that there has been a big increase in the number of countries on track to meet global nutrition targets, and encourages countries, including India, to establish specific and time bound targets for malnutrition reduction that are consistent with the new Sustainable Development Goals. National targets should help accelerate progress and promote accountability.
The GNR also points out that diet choices affect greenhouse gas emissions and that climate change will affect nutrition status. Climate policymakers should see healthy diets as a major opportunity for climate mitigation. In addition, the key role of food systems in promoting health is highlighted in the GNR. Given that poor diets are the number one risk factor for the global burden of disease, we know very little about how to make food systems more pro-nutrition. The GNR provides some ideas, such as investments to reduce the price of healthy foods such as fruits, vegetables and pulses.
Lawrence Haddad, the Co-Chair of the Global Nutrition Report and a Senior Research Fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute, said, “India’s accelerated rate of reduction in under-5 malnutrition is not only good for Indian families and the Indian economy, but it is also good for the world. In fact, India has the opportunity to do for malnutrition reduction in the SDG era what China did for poverty reduction in the MDG era.”
Both the GNR and IHR use available evidence on key areas for action in strengthening nutrition programmes, backed by scientific research, field experiences, expert perspectives and peer review.
Comments are closed.